FED. TRADE COMMI. v. NAT. UROLOGICAL GRP, 356 Fed.Appx. 358 (11th Cir. 2009)

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. NATIONAL UROLOGICAL GROUP, INC., d.b.a. Warner Laboratories, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant, National Institute for Clinical Weight Loss, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant, Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc., corporations, Jared Wheat, Thomasz Holda, individually and as officers of the corporations, Stephen Smith, individually and as officer of National Urological Group, Inc., and National Institute for Clinical Weight Loss, Inc., Terrill Mark Wright, M.D., individually., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 09-10617.United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
December 15, 2009.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Leslie R. Melman, John F. Daly, Rm. H-582, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee.

Page 359

Edmund J. Novotny, Jr., Baker, Donelson, Bearman Caldwell Berkowitz. P.C., Atlanta, GA, Joseph Paul Schilleci, Jr., Natter Fulmer, P.C., Birmingham, AL, for Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. D.C. Docket No. 04-03294-CV-CAP-1.

Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, BIRCH and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

After’ having thoroughly reviewed the record, the briefs and having heard oral argument in this case, we are of the opinion that the well-reasoned decision and the judgement of the district court should be and is AFFIRMED.