GRIFFIN v. LEVENSON, 400 Fed.Appx. 476 (11th Cir. 2010)

Derrick Devon GRIFFIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeffrey R. LEVENSON, Alfred J. Horowitz, Michael J. Satz, Joel Silvershein, Al Lamberti, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-11096 Non-Argument Calendar.United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
October 14, 2010.

Page 477

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Derrick Devon Griffin, Crestview, FL, pro se.

Okaloosa CI Warden, Inmate Trust Fund, Crestview, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Office of the Attorney General, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, for Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. D.C. Docket No. 0:09-cv-61749-JIC.

Before BARKETT, PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Derrick Devon Griffin, a Florida prisoner, appeals the district court’s sua sponte dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim, alleging that the defendants acted without authority during his Florida criminal prosecution. The court dismissed Griffin’s complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), after finding that Griffin’s § 1983 action should have been brought as a habeas petition.

When a state prisoner is challenging the very fact or duration of his physical imprisonment, and the relief he seeks is a determination that he is entitled to immediate release or a speedier release from that imprisonment, his sole federal remedy is a writ of habeas corpus. Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 500, 93 S.Ct. 1827, 1841, 36 L.Ed.2d 439 (1973). “When a state prisoner seeks damages in a § 1983 suit, the district court must consider whether a judgment in favor of the plaintiff would necessarily imply the invalidity of his conviction or sentence; if it would, the complaint must be dismissed unless the plaintiff can demonstrate that the conviction or sentence has already been invalidated.” Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 487, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 2372, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994).

Griffin fails to show that his § 1983 does not challenge the validity of his conviction and sentence. If the district court had found in favor of Griffin, then his conviction would have been invalidated. The district court properly dismissed Griffin’s § 1983 claim as the incorrect vehicle for a challenge to his conviction and sentence. See Heck, 512 U.S. at 481, 487, 114 S.Ct. at 2369, 2372. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal of Griffin’s complaint.

AFFIRMED.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

YUSKO v. NCL (BAHAMAS), LTD., No. 20-10452 (11th Cir. 07/12/2021)

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 20-10452 D.C.…

4 years ago

ALTMAN CONTRACTORS, INC. v. CRUM & FORSTER SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, No. 15-12816 (11th Cir. 1/26/2018)

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 15-12816…

8 years ago

SMITH v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, No. 13-14316 (11th Cir. 1/25/2017)

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 13-14316…

8 years ago

HUMANA MEDICAL PLAN, INC. v. WESTERN HERITAGE INSURANCE COMPANY, No. 15-11436 (11th Cir. 1/25/2018)

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 15-11436 ________________________…

8 years ago

THARPE v. WARDEN, 834 F.3d 1323 (11th Cir. 2016)

834 F.3d 1323 (2016) Keith THARPE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, Respondent-Appellee. No. 14-12464. Argument CalendarUnited States…

8 years ago

WALLACE v. BROWNELL PONTIAC-GMC CO., INC., 703 F.2d 525 (11th Cir. 1983)

DONALD G. WALLACE, ET AL., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANTS, v. BROWNELL PONTIAC-GMC COMPANY, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. No.…

9 years ago