No. 06-15131.United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
June 13, 2007.
Jill Kramer Traina, Office of the Attorney General, Miami, FL, for Respondents Appellant.
Page 927
Federal Public Defender, Miami, FL, Federal Public Defender, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, for Petitioner-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. D.C. Docket No. 04-22305-CV-ASG.
Before CARNES and WILSON, Circuit Judges, and WALTER,[*]
District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
For the reasons that we discussed with counsel at oral argument, we are convinced that no part of the petitioner’s ineffective assistance claim is unexhausted or procedurally barred, and the district court did not err in finding that the state court’s determination regarding the prejudice prong was an unreasonable application of the principles set out i Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).
AFFIRMED.