U.S. v. MASSENGALE, 385 Fed.Appx. 957 (11th Cir. 2010)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cedric MASSENGALE, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-16651 Non-Argument Calendar.United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
July 7, 2010.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Ramona C. Albin, U.S. Attorney’s Office, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Page 958

William Jordan Brower, Brower Law Office, Birmingham, AL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northen District of Alabama. D.C. Docket No. 08-00263-CR-2-LSC-PWG.

Before MARCUS, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

William J. Brower, appointed counsel for Cedric Massengale in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Massengale’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.