U.S. v. MURDOCH, 11-11210 (11th Cir. 10-6-2011)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICHARD A. MURDOCH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-11210 Non-Argument Calendar.United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
October 6, 2011.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 6:10-cr-83-GAP-DAB-1.

Before HULL, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

H. Kyle Fletcher, appointed counsel for Richard Murdoch in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant t Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738,

Page 2

87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Murdoch’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Page 1