U.S. v. NAVA, 243 Fed.Appx. 587 (11th Cir. 2007)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, Richard NAVA, a.k.a. Little Man, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-10809 Non-Argument Calendar.United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
September 27, 2007.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Richard H. Loftin, Mobile, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Robert A. Ratliff, Robert A. Ratliff, P.C., Mobile, AL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama. D.C. Docket No. 05-00321-CRWS-B.

Before TJOFLAT, DUBINA and CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Ratliff, Esq., appointed counsel for Richard Nava, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals counsels’ assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Nava’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.