U.S. v. QUINTINO, 257 Fed.Appx. 173 (11th Cir. 2007)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Trinidad QUINTINO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-10492, Non-Argument Calendar.United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
November 30, 2007.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

David Jonathon Joffe, Joffe Joffe, P.A., Ft. Lauderdale, FL, for Defendants Appellant.

Page 174

Anne R. Schultz, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. D.C. Docket No. 06-20157-CR-ASG.

Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, DUBINA and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

David Joffe, appointed counsel for Trinidad Quintino in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant t Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Quintino’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.