U.S. v. RODRIGUEZ, 392 Fed.Appx. 753 (11th Cir. 2010)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, Rafael RODRIGUEZ, a.k.a. Rafy, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-15975 Non-Argument Calendar.United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
August 16, 2010.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Rafael Rodriguez, Edgefield, SC, pro se.

Anne R. Schultz, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. D.C. Docket No. 09-20046-CR-JAL.

Before BLACK, HULL and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Tarre, appointed counsel for Rafael Rodriguez, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw isGRANTED, and Rodriguez’s conviction and sentence areAFFIRMED.