U.S. v. RUIZ-ZARAGOZA, 219 Fed.Appx. 892 (11th Cir. 2007)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose RUIZ-ZARAGOZA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-12441 Non-Argument Calendar.United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
March 6, 2007.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Duilio Abraham Espinosa-Montalban, Tampa, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Todd B. Grandy, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. D.C. Docket No. 05-00494-CR-T-26-MAP.

Before ANDERSON, BARKETT and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Duilio A. Espinosa-Montalban, appointed counsel for Jose Ruiz-Zaragoza, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ruiz-Zaragoza’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.