UNITED STATES v. DE LA PAZ, 385 Fed.Appx. 962 (11th Cir. 2010)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marilyn DE LA PAZ, a.k.a. Marilyn Martis, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-13117 Non-Argument Calendar.United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
July 7, 2010.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Anne R. Schultz, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marilyn Dela Paz, Coleman, FL, pro se.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. D.C. Docket No. 08-20567-CR-AJ.

Before BLACK, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas John Butler, appointed counsel for Marilyn De La Paz in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and De La Paz’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.